The fattest fairytale ever fed
fixes a folly to foil ones head.
Flattering its host with features to attract,
it forges a fiction flavored like fact.
It’s firm to force that flesh will fade
and fibers internal are forever in grade.
Made in faith this figure does flower,
framed as the most famous, favorite, phantasmal power.
Our father who art not in heaven,
figure in yet another seven
days or more
to free us from each and every war
scored in your shifty label,
your fading film like fraying fable
feeding on man’s fear of death,
a fog, lacking face and breath.
Fumbling upon only what is said,
this fairytale fantasy foots to wed
man with prayer
at his bed.
The fattest fairytale ever fed
It's definitely our discrimination of the details that determines the difference between dull and dazzling.
I often hear people speaking of how they want to be able to reach their “full” potential, as if they were currently operating at some lesser capacity. How I see it is, we are always operating at our full capacity because we only have one potential. Given the nature of causality, the engine of our deterministic environment, ones actions are determined by the conditions of the environment. There are no choices or options, only illusions of choices.
A concerned prospective father sent me a message asking,
“I’d like to learn something as a good father from you. Considering that you’re an atheist, how can teach your children how to behave in good manner and ethic. Because when I was a kid, my parents used to tell me “Be good boy and tidy your room then God will bless you…etc.” I don’t want to say these words to my children as a prospective father. And i wonder what do you say?”
It’s great that you are concerned about being a good father and are looking for the best way to teach and enforce moral values with your child. I wouldn’t want to say those words either, obviously since not only do I feel they are empty promises but they are also counterproductive to our ultimate aim.
When a theist asks,
“Why is there something rather than nothing?”
it is just a poor and unproductive way to ask “where did everything come from?”
The problem with the question, “Why is there something rather than nothing?” is that it is presented in a way as though “nothing” is another something that could “be,” which is not what “nothing” defines.
“But I want to say this: My God does not cause evil. God is not a vengeful and retributive being, waiting to strike us down; instead, God is in the very midst of this tragedy, suffering with those who are suffering. When evil strikes, it’s easy to ask, where is God? The answer is simple: God is suffering with those who are suffering.”
But does the Christian god really “suffer?” Given his characteristics, could he? And would he suffer over this? Let’s take a closer look.
Pat Robertson, an American televangelist, has recently stated that the reason for the earthquake in Haiti that has killed an estimated 100,000 people is due to a deal they made with the devil a long time ago.
“Something happened a long time ago in Haiti and people might not want to talk about. They were under the heel of the French, you know Napoleon the third and whatever. And they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said ‘We will serve you if you will get us free from the prince.’ True story. And so the devil said, ‘OK it’s a deal.’ And they kicked the French out. The Haitians revolted and got something themselves free. But ever since they have been cursed by one thing after another.”
On one hand, theists claim that god gave man free-will and that this omnipotent divinity does not assert its power over ones will and choices (because if it did than one would not have free-will), while on the other hand, some theists simultaneously claim that god answers prayers, performs miracles, and in general, intervenes. I find that these two claims are not compatible. Let’s first define some terms and then look at the relationship between these two claims and what the implications are of an omniscient god intervening in our affairs.
It is considered that a person has free-will if they have the ability to decide to do otherwise in any given situation, that a person exercises control over their actions, decisions, and choices. Theists claim that god gave them this ability and therefore each individual can be held accountable for their actions.